Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 13th Oct 2011 21:33 UTC, submitted by mahmudinashar
Thread beginning with comment 493135
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-02-17
Different hardware and different distros will make a huge difference in performance, I guess.
In and of itself, KDE performance is as you describe. "very snappy". "very responsive, menus and windows react right away".
It does, however, strictly rely on the underlying system, the proper working of the kernel and drivers. If these are not working properly, KDE4 does not contain any work-arounds, and the overall system may perform very poorly.
It is important to keep it crystal clear, however, that KDE4 itself is not broken, or poorly performed, as you have testified to. If KDE4 itself were broken, it would be broken for everybody.