Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 1st Nov 2011 22:55 UTC
Microsoft "Steve Ballmer had a dilemma. He had two groups at Microsoft pursuing competing visions for tablet computers. One group, led by Xbox godfather J Allard, was pushing for a sleek, two-screen tablet called the Courier that users controlled with their finger or a pen. But it had a problem: it was running a modified version of Windows. That ran headlong into the vision of tablet computing laid out by Steven Sinofsky, the head of Microsoft's Windows division. Sinofsky was wary of any product - let alone one from inside Microsoft's walls - that threatened the foundation of Microsoft's flagship operating system. But Sinofsky's tablet-friendly version of Windows was more than two years away." I'm still mad at Microsoft for this one.
Thread beginning with comment 495347
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: They was right
by MOS6510 on Wed 2nd Nov 2011 15:15 UTC in reply to "RE[6]: They was right"
Member since:

I enjoy old games more than new ones. On occasion I still play Paradroid, Revs, Mega Apocalypse, Twin Tornado. Yesterday I played a game of Delta on my Commodore 128.

And no RPG ever came close to matching the fun I had with Ultima V.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[8]: They was right
by zima on Wed 2nd Nov 2011 15:30 in reply to "RE[7]: They was right"
zima Member since:

You enjoy sparse selection of old games.

Overall, enjoyment being a very subjective thing, it gets easily influenced by what we desire to enjoy (hey, and it's fine, it's your time - I'm just saying, there's tons of good new stuff around, the old stuff is at best mostly just recollected - not played - for good reasons, it's IMHO insincere to forget that); our brains are very powerful, in a way, like that - and they are easily able to function differently if they "know" they should, it's an easy trick for them:

Edited 2011-11-02 15:33 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2