To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
jared_wilkes,
"sometimes a closed box is more inspiring than an open one. Inspiration and curiosity are innate to humanity."
"This is also a putdown: it's not that easy or closed just enables consumption. Easy and closed can foster creativity in any number of ways, including promoting programming."
There are a number of ways closed software is promoted, but this is a new one by me. Closed boxes inspire humanity? Closed fosters creativity and promotes programming? Wow...Talk about being a contrarian.
Sure. I would say it is far more the norm that I am inspired and curious about something that I can use or take part in first but don't understand rather than the cases where I actually need to learn about it and understand it before I can make use of it.
Do you actually think there is no way a kid can be inspired to program for iOS after using an iPad because it is not open source?
Edited 2012-01-03 05:13 UTC





Member since:
2011-04-25
"I'm not saying using Linux/android is inherently harder than windows/IOS because it isn't."
This was the one thought I agreed with: Linux is harder.
"With highly specialised and highly compartmentalised devices, there is no incentive to learn anything other than how to open and consume your favourite things."
Disagree. This is an overly pessimistic view that open advocates cling to. Difficulty doesn't inspire my curiosity. Nor does being exposed to the guts; sometimes a closed box is more inspiring than an open one. Inspiration and curiosity are innate to humanity.
This is also a putdown: it's not that easy or closed just enables consumption. Easy and closed can foster creativity in any number of ways, including promoting programming.