Linked by Matthew Johnson on Tue 31st Jan 2012 22:24 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 505477
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-08-22
I agree that using market share as a proxy for the factors that determine whether a given platform has a healthy OS ecosystem or not, or a viable and healthy future or not, is not that useful. It's a left over metric from the PC days when it was the metric. Market is not irrelevant but just not that central anymore, other key metrics (developer focus, profitability, the availability of third party software and peripherals, etc) have become detached from market share, market share no longer drives those metrics.