Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 22nd Feb 2012 15:24 UTC, submitted by Ajeet
Thread beginning with comment 508108
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
It would be nice to have a "flashless" web, just using open standards. Open standards work for all.
It depends how well defined they are. Just ask C developers, Web developers or Posix programmers. The undefined parts of the standard make the code not always behave the same way.
No stardard is perfect, e.g. posix has some open dark corners. With C, if you use a C99 compliant compiler you rarely have a problem. Of course if you develop for windows and want to port to Linux, *BSDs (or vice-versa), you have a nightmare ahead.
As far as i know microsoft's C compiler doe not support C99.I say again, open standards is the best option. Look at IPv4, HTML, JTAG, Ethernet and so on. Imagine the world we leave today wihtouy these standards...





Member since:
2009-06-03
No surprise for me, such thing happens when you depend on a propietary technology.

I would be a surprise if adobe would had developed a reasonable flash port for Linux 32 and 64 bits, which a lot of times has sucked all cycles to the bone from my CPU(s), and i was forced to kill the browes, no matter which was using flash plug in. And performance "issues" too. It is a "cowardice" to compare windows and Linux flash performance. Mac os i do not know, i do not use it.
It would be nice to have a "flashless" web, just using open standards. Open standards work for all.