Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 27th Feb 2012 11:19 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 508703
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Forcing Quallcom down to HW manufs throats isn't exactly the best way to their loyality.
Currenlty WP7 seems to be predominantly US focussed OS treating rest of the world as an afterthought.
Not supporting multithreading so that they could pitch x cores for better margins isn't cool either.
Currenlty WP7 seems to be predominantly US focussed OS treating rest of the world as an afterthought.
Not supporting multithreading so that they could pitch x cores for better margins isn't cool either.
True - hopefully that'll be addressed with Windows Phone 8 'Apollo' where the rumour is that it'll be based on Windows 8 'Core' which apparently is more flexible thus able to easily add support for more SOC's. For me the issue isn't the the number of cores given that Windows Phone 7 performances amazingly well already but the fact that you can't get phones with a bigger storage size than 16GB. People are using their phone for more than just 'being a phone', they're also using it to watch movies, record videos, record audio, listen to music, run applications etc. all of which need more space. As I noted previously, I have over 160GB of music so you guess how much of a PITA it would be if the largest storage on a phone is 16GB.




Member since:
2005-09-01
Forcing Quallcom down to HW manufs throats isn't exactly the best way to their loyality.
Currenlty WP7 seems to be predominantly US focussed OS treating rest of the world as an afterthought.
Not supporting multithreading so that they could pitch x cores for better margins isn't cool either.