Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 23rd Mar 2012 22:49 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 511678
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Well, Firefox 10 ESR is available for the rest of 2012, right?
I wouldn't really recommend it though.
http://www.chriscoulson.me.uk/blog/?p=111
I wouldn't really recommend it though.
http://www.chriscoulson.me.uk/blog/?p=111
Anyone with half a clue should not be running 2k or XP anymore anyway. There's no issue here at all.
OK, so I guess I have less than 50% of a proverbial "clue" - I am running XP on 3 (three) computers out of 6. XP SP3 mind you, but XP nevertheless.
And in all seriousness I do not understand why is it NOT OK to run a legacy OS on perfectly functional legacy hardware? Why do I have to "upgrade" a 5 - 6 year old box to the newest OS just because it's what everybody does? If OS security is up to date, which it still is, and OS features are adequate for my needs, why do I have to spend more money, pray tell?
Anyone with half a clue should not be running 2k or XP anymore anyway. There's no issue here at all.
I run XP in virtual machines all the time. It is much lighter weight. WinFLP is even lighter and is really XP under the hood.
To be honest, I wish that I could still run Win2K. I did right up into the Vista era but there is just too much software that will not work with it now and the security updates have stopped flowing.
XP will continue to get security updates for two more years. It has plenty of life left.





Member since:
2008-07-10
Well, Firefox 10 ESR is available for the rest of 2012, right?
I wouldn't really recommend it though.
http://www.chriscoulson.me.uk/blog/?p=111