Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 21st May 2012 20:03 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 518955
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
While in general you are correct that cl.exe / link.exe is available as a part of the Windows SDK, MS' C/C++ compiler has been more-or-less neglected in last ~5+ years, while both GCC and LLVM-clang have been quick to advance.
A couple of months ago I compile a piece of cross platform DPI software using both GCC-MinGW (4.6) and VS2K10 and in most aspects, GCC was 10-15% faster.
Keep in mind that in-order to maintain VS2KX compatibility the code doesn't include GCC specific optimizations (E.g. macros w/ return value) that could further increase the gap.
- Gilboa
Edited 2012-05-22 08:54 UTC