Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 27th May 2012 16:12 UTC, submitted by azrael29a
Thread beginning with comment 519624
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:35 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/11/13 17:07 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/10/13 23:13 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/08/13 14:57 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/07/13 11:40 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/04/13 12:45 UTC
Linked by nfeske on 05/31/13 10:12 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/29/13 16:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-07-18
Ah, Microsoft is just being efficient by letting Google do all the removal work, the links will disappear from Bing soon enough
http://www.osnews.com/story/24355/Google_Accuses_Bing_of_Stealing_I...
More seriously, given Microsoft's reputation, it wouldn't surprise me that this is some sort of bureaucratic "DoS" attack. Just compare the number of requests from Microsoft with the others, it's an order of magnitude bigger for something they don't really care about. A pirated windows is still better than Linux. And for content alone, one would expect the RIAA/MPAA to be on top.
Edited 2012-05-27 17:24 UTC