To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I feel like I have to point out that the spec actually does NOT mandate this. The manufacturer can implement such a non-secure-boot option, but they are not required to. And if they aren't required to do that, well, feel free to guess how many manufacturers will do that. "
The spec doesn't mandate it, but Microsoft does. According to Windows 8 Hardware Certification Requirements:
One shouldn't have to disable UEFI secure boot in the first place for alternate operating systems. There wouldn't be a complaint if the spec/certification required owners be able to change their keys to non-microsoft vendors....and of course the freedom to do it on ARM as well.
Edited 2012-05-31 18:03 UTC
EDIT: rr7.num7 beat me to it but stil...
Apparently the Electronic Frontier Foundation seems to disagree. In one of their recent articles they mention:
"In response to warnings and legal steps from the free software community, Microsoft agreed to require "Windows 8" certified x86 and x86-64 hardware vendors to offer a way to turn off this "secure boot" option that locks out user-modified OSes."
Quote taken from https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/05/apples-crystal-prison-and-futu...
So the total lockout would be for ARM hardware only.
Edited 2012-05-31 17:53 UTC




Member since:
2006-02-15
I feel like I have to point out that the spec actually does NOT mandate this. The manufacturer can implement such a non-secure-boot option, but they are not required to. And if they aren't required to do that, well, feel free to guess how many manufacturers will do that.