Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 7th Jun 2012 16:40 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 521269
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Lifehacker article
by Thom_Holwerda on Thu 7th Jun 2012 21:34
in reply to "RE: Lifehacker article"
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-14
Oh man. Did he just argue that fewer options == more customisable? Yes, he did. When you really, really have a point to prove, and no way to prove it, just go all-out into denial. For your like-minded, it might Just Work.
(Just Work is known to the State of California to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm.)