Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 20th Jun 2012 18:38 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 523089
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Nokia and differentiation
by AnXa on Wed 20th Jun 2012 22:17
in reply to "RE[2]: Nokia and differentiation"
It's not a good thing for Nokia at all. Like the man said, it's exactly like Apple would license some of the special software services they offer to everybody for a fixed price. And besides, they did that in the past when they tried to licensed Mac OS to 3rd party manufactures and while doing so failed to sell their own hardware because of it.
RE[4]: Nokia and differentiation
by tomcat on Sat 23rd Jun 2012 02:11
in reply to "RE[3]: Nokia and differentiation"
It's not a good thing for Nokia at all. Like the man said, it's exactly like Apple would license some of the special software services they offer to everybody for a fixed price. And besides, they did that in the past when they tried to licensed Mac OS to 3rd party manufactures and while doing so failed to sell their own hardware because of it.
Um, yeah, it is. If you choose Windows Phone, it's very highly likely that you chose a Lumia device, anyway. And they get paid, regardless.




Member since:
2006-05-25
They said they wanted to be different. It´s like Apple licensed Siri to others.