To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
"independent not-for-profit standards body" != "the government"
For example:
"ICANN (From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia)
The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN, /ˈaɪkæn/ eye-kan) is a nonprofit private organization headquartered in Los Angeles, California, United States, that was created on September 18, 1998, and incorporated on September 30, 1998[1] to oversee a number of Internet-related tasks previously performed directly on behalf of the U.S. government by other organizations, notably the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA), which ICANN now operates."
"Where are the lawyers? B/c this has to be stopped."
Suing to prevent the implementation of Secure Boot is certainly getting the government involved. Also the definition of what is a "standards body" seems to shift very quickly with how the person defining it feels about what they are doing. I could certainly start a non-profit that publishes documents that say that everyone should implement secure boot all day.





Member since:
2008-08-09
So you figure that the way towards software freedom is having the government regulate what software and hardware we may make?