Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 29th Jun 2012 22:55 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 524379
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Files are definitely fundamental to computers. Hence, we have file systems.
How a file is physically stored on a disk does not change the fact that it is a file and that the computer, OS and file system sees it as a file.
And file systems do "give a toss" as to whether or not a file is stored fragmented (at least those file systems that "give a toss" about speed) -- hence, we have defrag software.
RE[3]: Comment by tupp
by lucas_maximus on Sat 30th Jun 2012 09:34
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by tupp"
The first version of the Macintosh didn't have the concept of files at all.
As henderson said files aren't essential to how computers work.
It is a design decision that was made many years ago to how computers work.
A lot of this is covered in the book "I am not a gadget", but I doubt few on here will ever read it.





Member since:
2006-05-30
Files aren't fundamental to computers at all. Fies are a manifestation of human requirement for orderly storage of data. If you look at the physical file system on most OS, files are never stored exactly as you see them in your file manager. A computer file system doesn't give a toss that blocks of data thought of as a contiguous file in the human world, so long as it can be retrieved when required, thats all that matters.