Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 2nd Aug 2012 01:48 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Thread beginning with comment 529312
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Are the kde developers also in denial?
The look and to some degree feel are end-user customizable. Whatever you CAN and LIKE to make out of them is part of the desktop and the freedom that is delivered to you.
If yes, then that would explain why kde4 is still so kitsch.
Good example. So, what do you prefer? Change your taste to match to the default look and feel or change the look and feel to match to your default taste?
KDE did always focus on the second and I love it more then the alternate.
Edited 2012-08-02 14:28 UTC




Member since:
2009-07-10
There are three problems with pushing the design process to the users:
- It makes the desktop less attractive, despite all the work that went into it, many users won't even try it.
- Design should take place before the implementation, not after it.
- Most users can't design a desktop - they are perfectly able to judge it (which is what Gnome guys forget) but they do not necessarily know *how to make* a good desktop.
The KDE developers know how to make a good desktop, and that is what they do.
It is actually up to the distributions to make it look good. "
Are the kde developers also in denial? If yes, then that would explain why kde4 is still so kitsch.