Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 6th Aug 2012 00:00 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 529992
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Yes, easy once you memorize them. But easy to mix up once a new version is around the corner. And several years later, it's a lot harder to remember exactly what codename a specific release was, but again, the version number is a different story.
Debian's Toy Story code names are a lot easier than Ubuntu's even wackier ones though, I'll give 'em that.
Edited 2012-08-07 02:11 UTC





Member since:
2006-12-05
Whoops, I get Debian's weird release names mixed up all the time. That's what I actually meant.
I swear, I should just refer to them by version number... it's a lot harder to mix up. Doesn't help that with Debian's long release cycles, it's not uncommon to run across news items on two or three different versions of the distro (stable, oldstable, testing), and people usually use the codenames instead of version numbers.