To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
It's hard not to violate anyone's patents these days, that's the whole problem with this system.
Even though I dislike the system, if Nokia owns the patents Apple uses than Apple must pay a fair price. If Samsung violates any of Apple's rights they must pay too.
If anyone, Nokia/Samsung/Apple, lets it comes to a trail if they can't settle and have a judge look at it it's their fair right.
The problem with Apple is that they stopped settling and are going for the win/kill each time. This is something I don't like or agree with. Now I can understand they went after Samsung, but they shouldn't go after companies like HTC or Motorola.
They probably want to be different and think that's a mayor selling point they want to defend, but while companies like Samsung copy they should be busy coming up with the next trend or big thing, not hold on to the old/current one. The world is now used to phones that look and behave like iPhones. Banning Samsung, which would be not only extreme, but also rather unbelievable, just opens the door for another company.
Samsung doesn't have Apple's eco system. If Apple just made their eco system to hard to refuse for customers they'd be winners. No solo Samsung product can beat that.
Just cross license all the patents and work together to fight off patent trolls.




Member since:
2011-12-22
Um.. How about apple using Nokia patent without paying them out? And then paying ONLY WHEN they lose in the court?