Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 27th Aug 2012 11:32 UTC

Thread beginning with comment 532615
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Comment by Radio
by jared_wilkes on Mon 27th Aug 2012 16:43
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by Radio"
Which jury in which country in which case against which defendent through out Apple's FRAND defense?
Are you talking about Samsung and this recently decided case? And?
The jury determined that Apple did not prove an antitrust case in relation to patents they determined they didn't violate anyway and which were exhausted anyway.
What was your point as to how this relates to Google/Motorola?
Edited 2012-08-27 16:45 UTC
RE[4]: Comment by Radio
by lucas_maximus on Tue 28th Aug 2012 17:38
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by Radio"
Member since:
2005-06-29
funny. They're now countersuing Apple using non-FRAND Motorola patents. On top of that, the jury here threw out Apple's FRAND defence - however, the amateurish nature and fishy smell of this jury applies there, too, of course.