Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 4th Sep 2012 09:00 UTC
Apple This could be big - although just how big remains unclear. "There you have. 1,000,001 Apple Devices UDIDs linking to their users and their APNS tokens. The original file contained around 12,000,000 devices. We decided a million would be enough to release. We trimmed out other personal data as, full names, cell numbers, addresses, zipcodes, etc." How did AntiSec get this data (they claim)? From an FBI laptop. Why an FBI laptop would have a file with personal information on 12 million iOS users, we don't know - especially since 10000 of them are Dutch/Belgian, and last I checked, those do not fall under FBI jurisdiction. Did the FBI obtain it from an application developer, or from Apple itself? Then again - 12 million users? From a single iOS developer? I find that hard to believe.
Thread beginning with comment 533776
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Comment by Laurence
by Laurence on Tue 4th Sep 2012 09:29 UTC
Member since:

I've not viewed the contents (or even downloaded the file), but if the published data is purely just UDID then there's a chance this might be a hoax.

They might have just cracked the algorithm that generates UDID and published those. After all, if there's no user data associated, then how do you prove that those IDs were not generated rather than hacked.

But as I said, I'm just speculating based on what little information has been posted in here. If anyone has more information then I'd be very interested

Edited 2012-09-04 09:29 UTC

Reply Score: 2

RE: Comment by Laurence
by MOS6510 on Tue 4th Sep 2012 09:40 in reply to "Comment by Laurence"
MOS6510 Member since:

'0cb11950aa5fdfd24aaad38a39c1223592770c91','38db602b33ac54c3bf0550f a4054550d011adb0f6ef982bd79921b7dcbcf6acb','Laurence’s iPad','iPad'
'2956c245da3e3dbb23d3a437e627fc285b9dbab8','a61549c81d75ac46c2b01ba 31739b3544901114e3196f087d89284d6a09aabc2','laurence’s iPad','iPad'
'3dc97161297f601a98b3deeb56841f8d7df22e02','661c1610ff8d9ad1755639e b6e91ebf3268c8986f7b8cb937513d172be90aaf3','Laurence\'s iPad','iPad'
'5a07bd3a737818a71998be5210e1d75766b4bc36','db785464d1a45312f88afef 3a6afe6b034a805999d9473f7af98b3a855313c7b','Laurence’s iPad','iPad'
'5c7ece5b8d51962fae165889d3fea46e6c3055dd','1204fa2d68175a3f73fdf7c affb583eba5682a6c7be67eb437f7d1c12b929201','Laurence’s iPad','iPad'
'6d821ab2f557faaa203939d952bb765d6d72689f','61fe059163f86055b2d954f 53be983f9f39cde2a800d625e5eaab0db06785f60','Laurence’s iPad','iPad'
'6d821ab2f557faaa203939d952bb765d6d72689f','8f6e483641f2fc40aab7d30 5c934debf591d079528b20170b9c7321f09497680','Laurence’s iPad','iPad'
'6d821ab2f557faaa203939d952bb765d6d72689f','aa2067037e1eff611ec20a7 564a32ab9b8ce5b26d039925bf85adb9c8d6ff6c9','Laurence’s iPad','iPad'
'71f51fbd7810c314aae4f938cbb79da63d210e04','3dc6a8eed4e006ef4fdaf5f 8433a6eb7d210c54302233da2c2217bdc2132ce9c','LAURENCE’s iPad','iPad'
'ffd12e42211d2d7cddc885e219e9be7d2872cc27','fb4c1eacf173968c12c8be0 273b22bc44cbecd8699d522b4bfd10d35bca7d1b6','Laurence’s iPad','iPad'
'2c6e3ff598743cae7addfe88e9d1d039d445da11','41558120ce78947e2aa19ea 294d9bced3b66c3481d6399af554655ad99a7bbc9','Laurence\'s iPhone 4s','iPhone'
'1f2a3002cfef8794b212cc1cda57cd00c2ff1593','aa7816d9293e8d6b2e63cc4 cf420999ff10799f1e5f77770b96000a67bee8803','Laurence’s iPhone','iPhone'
'673b23ded5c3da24d366656f7ab1d4b05064bfc0','b98edafe57729b1f9ece37c 59ca52641b65688570020ad7face96cac810bc2dd','Laurence’s iPhone','iPhone'
'963b8acca0ec752afcb2dbacdfe956ddd3d7cf8a','98d7fa6a3c2774eddfd1f77 31589c90837a2e6ea4bd387db482b1fad5910aee7','laurence’s iPhone','iPhone'
'cc4a5651c160803bff742cb99192f06bcefe7312','986a1012b20719803b8f53a 00e0e9311285eb83579b12ec59b4190307c7ff560','Laurence’s iPhone','iPhone'
'fe742c9e24f0fa5389a122aeccc705b431ac6b04','8752e46ec4081811fc07ff3 f559128752d247bfe464628066a0faa737d9d3a57','Laurence’s iPhone','iPhone'
'f3b900b80af74b6f360e97b9b0583486a8d01d2d','7f47d1f70dc3a2b79c48b2a 8ea273d28bf63d80ec2aa494a87de545f29225ba6','Laurence\'s iPod','iPod touch'

Reply Parent Score: 5

RE[2]: Comment by Laurence
by Laurence on Tue 4th Sep 2012 11:23 in reply to "RE: Comment by Laurence"
Laurence Member since:

I see. It would be be pointless faking those details as they could easily be verified.

Reply Parent Score: 2