To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
If I replace my house with a pyramid and a few months later my neighbor suddenly also lives in a pyramid then I'd conclude he copied me.
Yes, pyramids have been around since aliens visited earth thousands of years ago, but really where did my neighbor get the idea from?
Samsung copied Nokia, BlackBerry and now Apple. Each time the went for the company who was doing best. The recent court case revealed how they were going to make their current products look and behave more Apple like.
The bright white earphones were a sign of an iPod in someone's pocket. Of all the colors and designs Samsung could have picked/copied they chose Apple's.
If Nokia suddenly sells millions of phones in all kinds of colors you can bet we'll suddenly see Samsung phones in all kinds of colors.
Well, let them, but don't claim Samsung innovates or offers customer choice. They offer copies, more of the same.
He'd be imitating you, yes, but that's not wrong. It just shows poor taste.
http://www.samsung.com/uk/consumer/mobile-devices/smartphones/
http://www.samsung.com/uk/consumer/mobile-devices/mobile-phones/
Hmm. I see A LOT of stuff there that doesn't resemble anything by Apple. The fact that you are completely oblivious to all the products Samsung ships does not negate the fact that they exist.
Yes, pyramids have been around since aliens visited earth thousands of years ago, but really where did my neighbor get the idea from?
A better parallel would be if several other people on your street had purchased pyramids before you - but you still conclude your neighbor copied you specifically, because of some superficial similarity. That's not only an example of the post hoc fallacy, but a sign of narcissistic personality disorder: assuming that everything is somehow about you.
Apple fanboism is nothing more than narcissistic personality disorder by proxy: iFanboys assume that everything is somehow about Apple. And if there's anything more pathetic than a narcissist, it's a narcissist who needs a proxy.
And, in turn, Apple copied Microsoft (Windows Mobile), Palm, and Nokia with the iPhone - Apple released a smartphone years afterward, so the only possible conclusion is that they were copying. Or, at least, that's the conclusion you would reach if you were honest enough to apply your "post hoc" reasoning consistently.
Of course, that's just SOP for Apple. They couldn't even be bothered to come up with an original name for their smartphone, and instead choose willful infringement of CISCO's "IPhone" trademark.





Member since:
2006-02-15
But as I said, that has been done already 30 years ago. How can it be copying Apple when Apple themselves aren't doing anything new either, and are in fact copying what's been done before?