Linked by thesunnyk on Sun 23rd Sep 2012 22:14 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 536247
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Comment by Sodki
by cyrilleberger on Mon 24th Sep 2012 08:45
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by Sodki"
Don't recall seeing the dock and the Aqua interface in OS 9. People did not seem to mind the differences either.
Are you kidding?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:MacOS922.png
There is a dock (it was introduced in Mac OS _7_ as the "Launcher"), there is a top window menu, even finder's icon is the same.
And now compare it to:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:OS_X_Mountain_Lion_Screenshot.jpg
So yes, for the user "Mac OS 10 is actually Mac OS 9 with prettier Window borders" (btw, Aqua is primarly a GUI theme). Yes, there is a huge difference between OSX and OS9, the Kernel, base systems, APIs and a more modern look, but a OS9 user felt at home right away in OSX, all the GUI elements were rather similar.
Now, as an exercice, try to count how many things are similar between Gnome 2 and 3.
Nice try, but no, the launcher is not the same as the dock. This is how the launcher functions and looks like in Mac OS 9:
http://www.cbtcafe.com/mactutorials/launcher/launcher.html
The control strip for control panel items, which is in your pic, does nothing like the OS X dock:
http://www.macoptions.com/tips/os/csm.html
The Aqua interface has buttons for application icon, maximise, minimise and close located differently on the titlebar and the removal of window borders. So it is not just a reskin, the placement and behaviour has changed. For example, OS 9 did not support the use of right click menus on the title bar.




Member since:
2005-07-07
You mean like how Mac OS 10 is actually Mac OS 9 with prettier Window borders? I thought it was a huge difference. Don't recall seeing the dock and the Aqua interface in OS 9. People did not seem to mind the differences either.
Yeah, they should have called Gnome 3 the Garden Gnome XL Extremist Edition. That way people will get it that it is different and yet it is a product of the GNOME Foundation?
Edited 2012-09-24 06:16 UTC