Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 20th Sep 2012 22:22 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 536301
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2011-08-08
No, that's not the same thing. There is a difference between distance traveled, speed you are traveling at and how fast you are accelerating or breaking. What you are doing is saying a car reducing its acceleration, but still increasing its speed, was braking.
No, what I am saying is that the decline was already present before tablets and was not noticeably accelerated because of tablets. That is plain & simple fact.
2011 vs 2010 growth 11.2%
2012 vs. 2011 growth -1.%
That's not a light misty rain, that's a devastating collapse in sales. That combined with the huge growth in smartphone sales has led parts manufacturers to shift focus.
Two enormous problems with your theory... One, there's no sign of devastation. There's not even any sign of serious concern. And two, none of the companies in these two markets have said anything that remotely agrees with your claim. I guess they're too busy raking in piles of cash to notice the "devastating collapse happening all around them.
The economy is part of it, not the entire thing. And it would be extremely foolish on your part to suggest the economy wasn't a factor when we know for a fact it was. This is not exactly a secret.
...Again... You really really want to believe tablets have killed PCs. And again, you ignore any facts that opposed your theory and refuse to understand that tablets and PCs aren't the same thing/interchangeable, and have separate markets. No amount of deniable will change the fact that the PC market continues to sell hundreds of millions of units per year with profits in the billions. Now how exactly would this be possible with the PC market was experiencing a "devastating collapse in sales"? It wouldn't.