Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 30th Sep 2012 20:15 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Thread beginning with comment 537208
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/15/13 22:44 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-08-18
Only if by great you mean "it sorta works and you don't really need to know anything to use it".
Granted the guy goes overboard a bit with the whining but PHP is truly horribly designed or more accurately, not designed at all.
Because quantity equals quality. Or not. It depends on what you want to "prove".
I would certainly hope professional chefs don't cook like amateurs.
Great job of making an argument that has nothing to do with the quality of PHP. At all.
Sorry to rain on your parade but the number of readers your blog have has no relation to how good your posts are.