Linked by Howard Fosdick on Mon 22nd Oct 2012 04:51 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 539540
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
by shotsman on Tue 23rd Oct 2012 05:24
in reply to "RE: Red Hat Enterprise Linux."
Not this old chestnut again.
Yes many years ago I like many used to suffer from 'RPM Hell'.
In recent years, I hardly ever use 'rpm' directly. Yum and Packagekit makes 'RPM Hell' a thing of the past IMHO.
Also, many package producers have got their act sorted out so that wierd dependencies are included in the package they are supplying.
Sadly, Oracle RDBMS still needs some wierd rpm's to install correctly but this is down to Oracle being a PITA when it comes to any Linux apart from their own.




Member since:
2012-06-22
I won't call it sane until they get rid of RPMs. RHEL seems sane until you end up chasing dependencies through RPM hell over some minor package that all the other distros support.
Red Hat support costs are also high when compared to Windows Server or Oracle.