Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 22nd Oct 2012 13:36 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 539549
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Apples patents are not FRAND
by Tony Swash on Mon 22nd Oct 2012 17:42
in reply to "RE[3]: Apples patents are not FRAND"
The bottom line - software patents must die. Or money hungry companies will just stall the industry with their idiotic wars.
What is so absurd about apocalyptic comments like this is that in the last five years we have had incredibly fast innovation and much greater patent litigation. So the idea that the scale of litigation will slow innovation is simplistic and disproved by the actual course of events.
All industries and markets undergoing a period of intense disruption caused by paradigm shifting innovation have seen an accompanying wave of intense IP litigation. The litigation waves have all faded, as will this one.
Try to stay calm and carry on, the end of the world is not nigh (except for some big tech companies).
RE[5]: Apples patents are not FRAND
by shmerl on Mon 22nd Oct 2012 18:11
in reply to "RE[4]: Apples patents are not FRAND"
incredibly fast innovation and much greater patent litigation
We had fast innovation in spite of greater patent litigation (which only continues to rise). I.e. the innovation could be even faster. There is no point to even argue about that - the damage of software patents to the progress of technology is self obvious.
RE[5]: Apples patents are not FRAND
by JAlexoid on Mon 22nd Oct 2012 19:44
in reply to "RE[4]: Apples patents are not FRAND"
All industries and markets undergoing a period of intense disruption caused by paradigm shifting innovation have seen an accompanying wave of intense IP litigation. The litigation waves have all faded, as will this one.
Yes that is true. We have to note, however, that unlike other industries it's the challenger that is going after the established players. That is not the usual for disruptive innovation... Usually the established players point the patent guns at the newcomers. Here, Apple has pointed the guns at established players(for all the right and all the wrong reasons).
RE[5]: Apples patents are not FRAND
by andydread on Mon 22nd Oct 2012 23:49
in reply to "RE[4]: Apples patents are not FRAND"
"The bottom line - software patents must die. Or money hungry companies will just stall the industry with their idiotic wars.
What is so absurd about apocalyptic comments like this is that in the last five years we have had incredibly fast innovation and much greater patent litigation. So the idea that the scale of litigation will slow innovation is simplistic and disproved by the actual course of events.
All industries and markets undergoing a period of intense disruption caused by paradigm shifting innovation have seen an accompanying wave of intense IP litigation. The litigation waves have all faded, as will this one.
Try to stay calm and carry on, the end of the world is not nigh (except for some big tech companies). "
You want to know what's apocalyptic? The fact that Apple has ushered in the era where sitting at your computer and writing your own code can get you sued the shit out of by their laywers. Even if its your own code that is completely different than theirs. Totally different code and Apple can just come along and say "your code violates one of our zillions of patents you cannot distribute your code." "All your code are belong to us" Fuck Apple.. Will not recommend any of their products to anyone going forward until they stop this bullshit. Nor will I purchase anymore of their products until they stopit. screwem.




Member since:
2010-06-08
The bottom line - software patents must die. Or money hungry companies will just stall the industry with their idiotic wars.