Linked by Howard Fosdick on Mon 22nd Oct 2012 04:51 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 539581
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/15/13 23:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Depends entirely on the user. Anyone who says otherwise is probably selling something. For what I want on my personal machines, that is near bleeding edge packages, binary format, and things left near their vanilla state until the admin chooses otherwise, Arch has proven to be the best choice. Doesn't hurt that it has some of the best documentation of any distro out there either.
Others may prefer something less administratively intensive, or something more conservative, or maybe something with a wider community... and those are all valid choices too. More power to them.
Edited 2012-10-22 19:01 UTC