Linked by Howard Fosdick on Sat 24th Nov 2012 17:52 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 543142
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
rsync all the way over dd...
I will say that Windows really isn't bad at this, though certainly less generic. I had a file server fail recently, and simply mounted the latest backup VHD on another server and tweaked the cname to point to the new place. Only took a couple of minutes, and everything kept working without interruption as far as the client desktops were concerned until I could bring up a proper replacement.
Was kind of cool really.
DFS replication could have made it all seamless, but that takes a lot of overhead.
Edited 2012-11-29 22:42 UTC




Member since:
2007-11-23
This is a very good, high quality and well written article. Thanks for giving me opportunity to check on other pro's policy.
I'm using FLOSS exclusively myself. Linux, *BSDs and other FLOSS operating systems.
However, the most important thing for me is data independence. I like it to be able to receive, read, write, manipulate my data no matter what platform I'm on. That's why I always go for simple solutions, which are more likely to be portable [like DD+gzip for backups, plain text files for information storage, etc]. It also makes the whole thing smaller, more compact and easy to move around.
I don't need to mention about multiple backups I make.