Linked by Howard Fosdick on Sat 24th Nov 2012 17:52 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 543254
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Comment by lucas_maximus
by tylerdurden on Wed 28th Nov 2012 02:56
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by lucas_maximus"
RE[3]: Comment by lucas_maximus
by Lennie on Thu 29th Nov 2012 11:04
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by lucas_maximus"
"PostgreSQL only has compatibility last time I checked with Microsoft SQL 7"
Would be nice to know what you mean.
PostgreSQL is one of the most, if not the most, standards compliant database out there.
Obviously a lot of databases don't stick to the standards or they create their own (extensions) first before it is proposed as a standard.




Member since:
2009-08-18
to MS and they love MS SQL server when PostgreSQL is clearly better for just about everything, same thing with web servers, they drool over IIS, and then wonder why it was hacked into in a matter of hours....
You start to lose credibility when you say MS ...
IIS has less vunerabilities reported recently than Apache.
Microsoft SQL Server is pretty good. The IDE for it is one of the better SQL Editors that I have used. PostgreSQL only has compatibility last time I checked with Microsoft SQL 7, not sure about Oracle with PL/SQL.
Edited 2012-11-26 12:47 UTC