Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 5th Dec 2012 16:56 UTC, submitted by estherschindler
Thread beginning with comment 544328
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: But what does Wayland mean for Android?
by Morgan on Wed 5th Dec 2012 20:21
in reply to "RE: But what does Wayland mean for Android?"
I'm no developer, but I wonder if it would even scale up to desktop use. It's designed for one fullscreen app at a time; no window management would be possible without heavy modification.
And let's not forget what die hard X fanatics would miss the most: Remote X sessions. I've used them in the past from time to time, but there are some people for whom that feature is a necessity.
I may be wrong, but I think the best solution is to clean up and modernize X rather than shoehorn a mobile framework onto desktops. I don't have a problem with Wayland either, but I'm interested to see where the various distros go.
RE[3]: But what does Wayland mean for Android?
by zima on Wed 5th Dec 2012 21:23
in reply to "RE[2]: But what does Wayland mean for Android?"
I'm no developer, but I wonder if it would even scale up to desktop use. It's designed for one fullscreen app at a time; no window management would be possible without heavy modification.
I doubt it's much of a limitation - pull-down notification area can be already seen as another window on top of an app?





Member since:
2007-01-25
And why not just take SurfaceFlinger as a replacement for X Windows?