Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 14th Dec 2012 11:51 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 545191
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: foster the friendly competitor
by fran on Fri 14th Dec 2012 21:19
in reply to "RE: foster the friendly competitor"
Less aggressive? Microsoft has been suing almost every major android handset vendor for royalties for the past few years.
Under that context, why would google go out of their way to enhance the functionality of a competing product by microsoft?
Under that context, why would google go out of their way to enhance the functionality of a competing product by microsoft?
Yes, less aggressive. Apple generally seeks for sale ban's more often while Microsoft are more licensing friendly.
RE[3]: foster the friendly competitor
by tylerdurden on Sat 15th Dec 2012 00:47
in reply to "RE[2]: foster the friendly competitor"
It depends then on what your personal definition of "aggressive" is.
All of the 3 players here; apple, microsoft, and google do not mess around when it comes to enforce their patents. I assume microsoft would have sought similar sales bans if the targeted android vendors had refused to pay the requested per-device fees to microsoft.





Member since:
2009-03-17
Less aggressive? Microsoft has been suing almost every major android handset vendor for royalties for the past few years.
Under that context, why would google go out of their way to enhance the functionality of a competing product by microsoft?
Edited 2012-12-14 20:34 UTC