Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 12th Dec 2012 22:03 UTC
Google A change to anything related to Google Search - the product so many of us rely on - is never going to go by unnotoced. This time around, Google has altered Image Search for US users to alter the way it handles that ever so important aspect of the web - adult content.
Thread beginning with comment 545200
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[10]: porn destroys cultures
by Hiev on Fri 14th Dec 2012 21:23 UTC in reply to "RE[9]: porn destroys cultures"
Hiev
Member since:
2005-09-27

Never mind the fact that Google doesn't clearly explain why this has been done and how to get around it for those who don't want to be restricted

Why did Google didn't add an option for opt out? I don't know, but what would that be relevant? if you want porn, you don't go to Google images, that's for sure.

Google is trying to play net nanny here

Some of these people will probably end up switching search engines as a result.

yeah, the ones looking for porn in google images for sure, how many of those freaks are out there? is a mistery.

Filtering, blocking, censoring... there's not much of a difference here in the end result. "Filtering" is just a method of excluding/blocking/censoring content.

Yes there is, but as the rest of the complainers, seems like you want everybody to see porn as something armless and part of our every day life, so you don't feel judged, and create all this whole argument about censorship just to mask the fact, that you don't want to be judged for the sick things you look at the internet.

Reply Parent Score: 1

UltraZelda64 Member since:
2006-12-05

Yes there is, but as the rest of the complainers, seems like you want everybody to see porn as something armless and part of our every day life, so you don't feel judged, and create all this whole argument about censorship just to mask the fact, that you don't want to be judged for the sick things you look at the internet.

No, my whole point from the beginning (which you still seem to fail, more likely refuse, to understand) is that everyone should be free to decide what they want based on what they believe. Don't want porn? Great, you're all set right from the start; it should be blocked by default, to avoid offending anyone who just does not want to see it under any circumstances for whatever reason. You know--people like you.

Don't want other people telling you what you should do? Once again, it should be a simple option that can easily be found on the settings page for those who want it. That would clearly be a choice for people to willingly make, not forcing anything onto anyone. You know... opt-in. Don't want it? Don't check that box. No harm done.

If anything, this would give the anti-porn people the advantage by blocking it by default just like it always has, so seriously, explain how the fuck this would be "forcing" any views onto anyone?

And speak for yourself--not all porn is "sick things." There you go again, purposely using terms like "sick things" to describe everything down to an uncovered female nipple. You want to see some "real" sick things? Try goatse or some other shock site. Try some of the truly disturbing, highly-niche crap that probably no one in their right mind would want to see.

By the way, I said it before, Google is the last place I would ever go to actually seek any kind of porn from, but I have always kept the image filters off. Why? Because not only am I mature enough to handle a few tits if they do show up, I don't want my results censored or skewed by any group of people over any belief that I do not share.

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[12]: porn destroys cultures
by Hiev on Fri 14th Dec 2012 22:55 in reply to "RE[11]: porn destroys cultures"
Hiev Member since:
2005-09-27

is that everyone should be free to decide what they want based on what they believe.

Then start your own search engine, you cannot trust that kind of labor to Google, they are a private company and private companies do whatever is best for their own interests not yours.

here you go again, purposely using terms like "sick things" to describe everything down to an uncovered female nipple.

I certainlty don't consider nudity as porn, but, there is cheap nudity that certaintly should be blocked.

Edited 2012-12-14 22:59 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 0

WereCatf Member since:
2006-02-15

You want to see some "real" sick things? Try goatse or some other shock site.


Huh. I may be the odd one out here, but I don't find goatse particularly disturbing, I've seen worse.

Reply Parent Score: 2

fmaxwell Member since:
2005-11-13

yeah, the ones looking for porn in google images for sure, how many of those freaks are out there? is a mistery.

Millions of adults enjoy eroticism. The "freaks" are those asexual weirdos who can't understand why other adults would enjoy erotic material.

Reply Parent Score: 2