Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 15th Dec 2012 19:11 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 545353
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: The Rosa Parks Principle
by Soulbender on Sun 16th Dec 2012 07:03
in reply to "The Rosa Parks Principle"
This comparison is just so wrong.
They would not have gotten as far if they had used the pregnant teenager who did the same before her.
As I can recall, the argument wasn't that Rosa Parks, and she alone, should be excluded from the segregation laws. There was no "lets exclude this one person as a first step" argument.
Really, I understand your point but this is just not a good comparison.
RE[2]: The Rosa Parks Principle
by kwan_e on Sun 16th Dec 2012 07:24
in reply to "RE: The Rosa Parks Principle"
This comparison is just so wrong.
"They would not have gotten as far if they had used the pregnant teenager who did the same before her.
"They would not have gotten as far if they had used the pregnant teenager who did the same before her.
As I can recall, the argument wasn't that Rosa Parks, and she alone, should be excluded from the segregation laws. There was no "lets exclude this one person as a first step" argument.
Really, I understand your point but this is just not a good comparison. "
It's actually a very good comparison, because no one is arguing that Alan Turing and Alan Turing alone should receive a pardon. No, that is the fantasy dreamt up by all the naysayers.





Member since:
2007-02-18
Here's yet another angle on this:
Rosa Parks was not the first person to publicly oppose the segregation culture. There had been a few before her. So why is her name in the history books and not the others?
Because community leaders who wanted to organize a mass protest recognized the need for a person with a good public image. They would not have gotten as far if they had used the pregnant teenager who did the same before her.
As a result of this, Rosa Parks had a disproportionate amount of credit and special treatment, for those cynics and I-hate-political-correctness-types amongst us.
Would the people here say that they'd rather not have racial equality if it meant two people, Rosa Parks and MLK, got more recognition than the others? Like it or not, this is the same attitude being applied to Turing. You'd rather have nothing happen that try to START something.