Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 18th Dec 2012 17:31 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 545761
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
But services need to be built from the ground up in a way that respects privacy and upholds it. I.e. using encryption, allowing setting the exposure only to the desired group and so on.
Try right-click on images, then save as and send them on whatever image hosting you want. Take that, encryption.
A much more sensible policy in my opinion is to make companies spell out their privacy policy in human readable terms.
That way the layman can make a conscious choice about either using the service or not. An informed choice should be in the end goal.
People should be as wary about personally identifiable information, and how their data is used, as they are about their passwords or social security number.





Member since:
2010-06-08
That assumes that users don't care about their privacy or "there is no privacy on the net". Both these ideas are false. Users care and there is privacy. But services need to be built from the ground up in a way that respects privacy and upholds it. I.e. using encryption, allowing setting the exposure only to the desired group and so on.
Edited 2012-12-18 20:56 UTC