To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
The Replicant SDK is not the Android SDK. It is an offshoot SDK for an offshoot distribution to Android. The owner of the project agrees with me.
The Android SDK, which is exactly what is being criticized, contains a license agreement you need to agree upon to be able to use.
Not that I care, it's stupid to complain about agreeing to a license agreement. This is much ado about nothing.
But has anybody compared it to what Google has in its SDK? Because if all they wanted was to protect its copyrights like Mozilla why wouldn't they just use something like the MPL, why go to all this extra mess and BS?
So before I'd say "oh the source is there and its the same" I'd want somebody to do a comparison, after all it wouldn't be the first time a company has given some but not all of the code.




Member since:
2005-07-12
From the Replicant page:
After downloading the Replicant SDK from the ReplicantSDK page, it should work the same as the Android SDK as provided by Google except that the Replicant SDK already contains a built and ready to use emulator image.
If you had bothered to follow the link to the Replicant page, you'd see that they offer the same SDK without Google's restrictions, built from the same source. Emulator included.
But, no. It's more satisfying to remain wrong and believe you were right the entire time.