Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 5th Jan 2013 14:53 UTC
Talk, Rumors, X Versus Y And so this situation is starting to get ridiculous - and consumers are, as usual, caught in the middle of it all. Google has just blocked Windows Phone devices from accessing Google Maps on their phones. In addition, it also seems Windows Phone users are now restricted to the basic HTML version of the mobile GMail website. While understandable from a defensive perspective - Microsoft's extortion scheme targeting Android device makers and all that - it's still a massive dick move that only hurts consumers. Update: the media attention has worked - Google is backpedalling, and will remove the redirect. "We periodically test Google Maps compatibility with mobile browsers to make sure we deliver the best experience for those users. In our last test, IE mobile still did not offer a good maps experience with no ability to pan or zoom and perform basic map functionality. As a result, we chose to continue to redirect IE mobile users to Google.com where they could at least make local searches. The Firefox mobile browser did offer a somewhat better user experience and that’s why there is no redirect for those users. Recent improvements to IE mobile and Google Maps now deliver a better experience and we are currently working to remove the redirect. We will continue to test Google Maps compatibility with other mobile browsers to ensure the best possible experience for users."
Thread beginning with comment 547590
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Karma
by mistersoft on Sun 6th Jan 2013 18:46 UTC in reply to "RE: Karma"
mistersoft
Member since:
2011-01-05

..i don't think the whole 'pot kettle black' thing is lost on anyone here.


If i were summing it up (presuming Google has done this very much on purpose and not at all accidentally; backpedalling or no) then:

Google -it's Wrong!....but almost a bit funny...but still wrong!.


Whoever it was earlier that proposed banning user agent strings and replacing with a standards/extensions compatibility string(s) - not a bad idea really

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[3]: Karma
by lucas_maximus on Sun 6th Jan 2013 19:00 in reply to "RE[2]: Karma"
lucas_maximus Member since:
2009-08-18

do you realise that already doable via JavaScript? Also any string would be ridiculously long.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[4]: Karma
by mistersoft on Sun 6th Jan 2013 22:59 in reply to "RE[3]: Karma"
mistersoft Member since:
2011-01-05

In fairness, yes I know you're entirely right strictly speaking - I just like the idea of trying to promote a change in emphasis really ; from the flagging up differences or perculiarities in handling to a (ideal) wholesale concentration on the flagging up of compatibilities.

Reply Parent Score: 1