Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 20th Jan 2013 23:42 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 549720
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Comment by Beerfloat
by Beerfloat on Tue 22nd Jan 2013 10:57
in reply to "RE: Comment by Beerfloat"
Well that's Android for you, isn't it? People can do what they want with it, which is cool in my book, though I've heard some others claim this kind of fragmentation is not a net positive.
But that's neither here nor there. There's a reference Android out there, and despite the availability of some cool hacks, I don't think anyone can seriously claim Google designed Android <= 4.x as a windowed operating system. Anyone aside from Thom, that is.
RE[3]: Comment by Beerfloat
by Thom_Holwerda on Tue 22nd Jan 2013 11:32
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by Beerfloat"
I don't think anyone can seriously claim Google designed Android <= 4.x as a windowed operating system. Anyone aside from Thom, that is.
And yet, nobody's been able to provide a counterargument to my statement - other than adding arbitrary restrictions to the established definition.





Member since:
2005-07-11
Samsung allows you to run two programs side-by-side on Android 4.x (Note, Note II, and Galaxy S3; probably their tablets as well).
The notifications slide down in their own window over top of whatever is currently running.
Pull up the recent tasks list and it runs in its own window over top of whatever is currently running.