Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 22nd Jan 2013 21:28 UTC, submitted by lemur2
Linux "If you consider NetApplications' data set, then Linux owns only about 1 percent of the desktop OS market and Windows has almost 92 percent. But if you consider all computing platforms, including mobile, than Windows has only 20 percent and Linux has 42 percent - and that would be in the form of Google's Android alone." No more or less legitimate than claiming Windows owns 92% of the market. It's all a matter of perspective.
Thread beginning with comment 549969
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Linux is a kernel
by lemur2 on Wed 23rd Jan 2013 02:39 UTC in reply to "Linux is a kernel"
lemur2
Member since:
2007-02-17

Except Linux is a kernel not an Operating System. Ubuntu/Debian/Red Hat, etc. are Operating Systems and are not the same thing as Android. The various other embedded devices that are based on the Linux kernel are their own unique Operating Systems. Trying to lump them all together is ludicrous at best. There are hundreds of Operating Systems which are referred to as "distributions" based on the Linux kernel.


Linux (the kernel) and GNU/Linux (the operating system) Has over 90% of the supercomputer OS market share.

http://www.unixmen.com/linux-share-in-supercomputer-os/

Linux accounts for as much as 94.2% share as Supercomputer OS!

Linux has a near-monopoly in embedded devices, such as TVs, DVD players and the like:

http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-linuxuniversal/

Linux is dominant in the server market (60%) and also the cluster and distributed computing market (66%).

Linux is dominant in every market except the desktop. None of these operating systems are the same (as complete operating systems) ... the machines involved in these markets are nowhere near as homogenous as the desktop market.

Nevertheless, a significant majority of the world's computers run Linux. Globally, over all computers, as a rough estimate Linux would run on over 65% of machines.

The fact that the OSes running are different on different machines does not mean that we cannot make this statement.

Reply Parent Score: 5

RE[2]: Linux is a kernel
by Nelson on Wed 23rd Jan 2013 03:22 in reply to "RE: Linux is a kernel"
Nelson Member since:
2005-11-29

People call me a Microsoft shill, but I can only hope to be half as good as lemur2 is at shilling for Linux and KDE.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[3]: Linux is a kernel
by lemur2 on Wed 23rd Jan 2013 04:41 in reply to "RE[2]: Linux is a kernel"
lemur2 Member since:
2007-02-17

People call me a Microsoft shill, but I can only hope to be half as good as lemur2 is at shilling for Linux and KDE.


Compared to your good self I am merely an amateur ... I don't get paid at all. Did you see the link I provided earlier to an example of costs of a consumer Linux desktop versus a Windows desktop:

http://www.osnews.com/permalink?549963

Here we saw that the cost (to a consumer) per machine for a Windows desktop OS and Office suite installation was $AUD344 more than a Linux desktop and office suite installation for the exact same $599 hardware.

I'm sure that your commission for shilling, coming out of a percentage of $AUD344 per machine, amounts to a much better income than my "commission" out of $0 per machine.

LOL.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[3]: Linux is a kernel
by pos3 on Wed 23rd Jan 2013 10:47 in reply to "RE[2]: Linux is a kernel"
pos3 Member since:
2010-06-25

I don't think anyone can come close to you ;)

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[2]: Linux is a kernel
by 0brad0 on Wed 23rd Jan 2013 03:38 in reply to "RE: Linux is a kernel"
0brad0 Member since:
2007-05-05

The fact that the OSes running are different on different machines does not mean that we cannot make this statement.


And that is creating bogus useless statistics. Yes, they're all using the same kernel but they're all different Operating Systems.

Reply Parent Score: 3