To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Well python has an advantage in that it doesn't compile to machine code. So it's not really a fair comparison. I think you'd be hard pressed to find a language as powerful as the C or even Go that didn't get messy with complexity. Except maybe if you switched programming paradigms entirely. Lisp is next on my todo list.
Well python has an advantage in that it doesn't compile to machine code. So it's not really a fair comparison.
Fair enough, lets compare it to D and Vala, those are as powerful as C, are native and with better syntax, or lets compare it to pascal, I mean, it is native, coherent syntax (verbose, but hey, is readable), so that's my point, Google with Go sacrificed readability in alas to make it more compact.
Edited 2013-01-23 22:54 UTC





Member since:
2005-09-27
You said that every language has unreadable code, I said, some are ironed (not solved) for that like Python and some fail like Ruby.
I said that it is easy in Go as C++ to make unreadable code, and that's why I said is a C like language.
And that example I gave is the less complicated one, I can put another one with pointers, arrays and callbacks if you want.
Go IMHO it is designed to be less verbose but is cryptic at the same time.
Edited 2013-01-23 22:41 UTC