Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 25th Jan 2013 14:20 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 551144
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
How can an OS enthusiast or a Nokia lover forget that? Why can't you distinguish between supporting/liking a company and agreeing with any decision its management makes?
Some have/had a sweet spot for Nokia and suffered seeing it dismembered, seeing its expensive but so advanced OS developing division vanish [...] seeing a European success story turning into a freefall
Nokia was in freefall for several years before Elop, many people in turn just refuse to see that because of their emotional investment with "old Nokia"
Those expensive OS division pursuits were giving very mediocre results. 2-3 years ago the Symbian R&D alone was eating more money than the entire R&D of Apple.
Moreover, the one OS which remains (and which was funding that lavish R&D all the time), S40, sees nice improvement recently, under Elop.
I had a sweet spot for Nokia too - but I mostly got over it, I suggest you do the same.