Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 5th Feb 2013 16:49 UTC
Legal "The case against patents can be summarized briefly: there is no empirical evidence that they serve to increase innovation and productivity, unless productivity is identified with the number of patents awarded - which, as evidence shows, has no correlation with measured productivity. Both theory and evidence suggest that while patents can have a partial equilibrium effect of improving incentives to invent, the general equilibrium effect on innovation can be negative. A properly designed patent system might serve to increase innovation at a certain time and place. Unfortunately, the political economy of government-operated patent systems indicates that such systems are susceptible to pressures that cause the ill effects of patents to grow over time. Our preferred policy solution is to abolish patents entirely and to find other legislative instruments, less open to lobbying and rent seeking, to foster innovation when there is clear evidence that laissez-faire undersupplies it. However, if that policy change seems too large to swallow, we discuss in the conclusion a set of partial reforms that could be implemented." Written by economics professors Michelle Boldrin and David K. Levine, published in the winter issue of the Journal of Economic Perspectives. Via John Siracusa.
Thread beginning with comment 551588
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: one easy limitation
by kwan_e on Wed 6th Feb 2013 01:19 UTC in reply to "RE: one easy limitation"
kwan_e
Member since:
2007-02-18

Patents must be written in working Python.

Using 7zip on the highest settings, compression should not reduce the size below 70% of the original.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: one easy limitation
by galvanash on Wed 6th Feb 2013 04:26 in reply to "RE[2]: one easy limitation"
galvanash Member since:
2006-01-25

Patents must be written in working Python.


Ironically, that would make them far easier to read, even for non-programmers.

Reply Parent Score: 2