Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 3rd Oct 2013 22:25 UTC
Mozilla & Gecko clones

Whether or not the Open fits your needs, one thing is clear: Mozilla needs more capable hardware to demonstrate Firefox OS' potential. The Open is good for someone whose alternative would be a basic flip phone, but the camera quality, connectivity, display and performance don't do full justice to the software.

A promising start, but clearly better hardware is needed. I'm really hoping Firefox OS gets a fair shot.

Thread beginning with comment 573842
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: I agree 100%
by bassbeast on Fri 4th Oct 2013 01:49 UTC in reply to "I agree 100%"
bassbeast
Member since:
2007-11-11

What is sad is here in the USA the Android phones they give away with the low end prepaid plans like Straight talk are frankly better and those are phones from 2011/2012. This has a lousy 256Mb of RAM while the LG Optimus Q and Samsung precedent both have 512Mb and while they only have an 800MHz CPU they are snappy and frankly RAM matters when it comes to apps.

It doesn't matter how "free" the OS is if you put it on crap hardware, this is the problem Linux had with the OEMs who would take the older crappy hardware they had lying around and slap Linux on it. Moz better put their foot down and set basic standards that let the OS shine because in the end folks will NOT blame the OEMs, they'll say FFOS sucks.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[2]: I agree 100%
by Lennie on Fri 4th Oct 2013 07:47 in reply to "RE: I agree 100%"
Lennie Member since:
2007-09-22

They aren't really intended for most of the people in the US market.

As the article says:

'it's meant to deliver a smartphone experience to those who'd otherwise buy a basic cellphone -- not to become the "next iOS or Android."'

This is part of the reason FirefoxOS exists, bring smartphones to people that don't have a lot of money to spend on it.

So hardware will be less amazing if you pay less money, who would have expected that ?

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[3]: I agree 100%
by unclefester on Fri 4th Oct 2013 08:37 in reply to "RE[2]: I agree 100%"
unclefester Member since:
2007-01-13


'it's meant to deliver a smartphone experience to those who'd otherwise buy a basic cellphone -- not to become the "next iOS or Android.


The point is that vastly better hardware is available in the same price range. eg Huawei Y300 - dual core, 512MB RAM, 800x480 IPS screen etc sells for under $100.

Reply Parent Score: 5

RE[3]: I agree 100%
by bassbeast on Fri 4th Oct 2013 15:48 in reply to "RE[2]: I agree 100%"
bassbeast Member since:
2007-11-11

Uhhh...thanks I so rarely get to post this WHOOSH! The point of my post was that the GIVE AWAY phone on even the lowest tier prepaid plans have BETTER hardware than this phone!

Again this sounds like an excuse to dump the low end junk they can't sell on the regular market by saying "Oh its not FOR you, its for dumbphone users" while ignoring that the cheapest low end phones smoke this thing, no different than how Walmart took low end Via C3 single cores and some junk 40Gb HDDs and old DDR 1 sticks and said "This is a perfect Linux platform" when it reality Win98 would have ran on this hardware NOT a modern OS. BTW remember these phones I discribe are not only 2 years old but are GIVE AWAYS, totally unsubsidized, just buy a phone card and they will hand you this phone for nothing!

When even the lowest tier refurb junkers smoke your brand new phone in 2013? i'm sorry but its junk and no way in hell you can spin a junk phone into something else. Hell the ultra cheapo phones on Chinamart have more RAM than this!

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[3]: I agree 100%
by Wafflez on Fri 4th Oct 2013 18:19 in reply to "RE[2]: I agree 100%"
Wafflez Member since:
2011-06-26

Except basic cellphones last for an eternity on one charge compared to big screen smartphones.

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[2]: I agree 100%
by MeinNick on Sat 5th Oct 2013 17:46 in reply to "RE: I agree 100%"
MeinNick Member since:
2013-03-14

Not that it really matters on a website about operating systems and mobile devices, but I think you really meant "256 MB" when you said "256 Mb".

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: I agree 100%
by zima on Thu 10th Oct 2013 23:48 in reply to "RE[2]: I agree 100%"
zima Member since:
2005-07-06

MiB ;)

Reply Parent Score: 2