Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 11th Dec 2013 13:40 UTC

The Verge is reporting that Microsoft is considering making Windows RT and Windows Phone free for OEMs, to combat Android.

We understand that any decision to axe the license fees for Windows Phone and Windows RT would be backed by a push for revenue from Microsoft’s apps and services. Microsoft has been experimenting with ads in Windows 8 apps, and any associated revenue from those apps and the company’s built-in Bing search results would help offset the lack of license fees. Microsoft would also push consumers to subscribe to services like SkyDrive, Office, and Skype for additional revenue.

So, let me get this straight. In April this year, a Microsoft-sponsored antitrust complaint about Android had this to say:

Google's predatory distribution of Android at below-cost makes it difficult for other providers of operating systems to recoup investments in competing with Google's dominant mobile platform.

And we have the whole Scroogled campaign (I felt dirty just for visiting that site).

And now they're considering doing the exact same things they claim Google is doing unfairly? Does this company have any internal consistency whatsoever?

Thread beginning with comment 578505
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Comment by Sisora
by Morgan on Wed 11th Dec 2013 18:15 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by Sisora"
Member since:

Something I've noticed among friends with iOS devices and friends with Android devices: iOS users seem to be bothered less about the cost of a media purchase via iTunes, and are generally happy about the plethora of titles to choose from. Android users generally seem to be against buying a movie or TV episode from Play, and don't care about the availability of specific titles since they tend to get media under the table, so to speak.

I'm not saying that's true across the board, obviously, but in my tiny niche of society it seems to be the norm.

Edited 2013-12-11 18:15 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 6

RE[4]: Comment by Sisora
by zlynx on Wed 11th Dec 2013 23:02 in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by Sisora"
zlynx Member since:

I don't buy stuff on Play usually. I mean, why would I?

I have Netflix and Amazon Prime for movies and TV series, which covers most of what I want to watch.

I read a lot of e-books which I prefer to get without DRM but Kindle is my fallback. There is a Kindle app for everything and the actual Kindle hardware is decent too.

The only thing I buy from the Google store is the apps, mostly games.

Reply Parent Score: 5

RE[4]: Comment by Sisora
by JAlexoid on Thu 12th Dec 2013 10:46 in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by Sisora"
JAlexoid Member since:

iOS users seem to be bothered less about the cost of a media purchase via iTunes

And in my circle of friends I notice that iOS users are no less of freeloaders than Android users. I guess anecdotal evidence is just that - anecdotal.

Reply Parent Score: 6

RE[4]: Comment by Sisora
by MOS6510 on Thu 12th Dec 2013 11:06 in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by Sisora"
MOS6510 Member since:

A number of surveys have looked in to this and it is indeed a general trend that iOS users spend more (and not just on iOS/Apple stuff).

I don't think it's because these people like to spend money, but more because they have more money anyway than the average Android user.

When you have a lot of money it makes it easier to spend it I guess.

But what is also a factor, I think, is that a lof of Android users use their phone as a feature phone. They don't even get to the pay button. And why should they, if their needs are so limited.

Reply Parent Score: 1