Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 26th Mar 2014 14:48 UTC
Legal

In early March, 2007, as Google was expanding fast and furiously, one of its recruiters from the "Google.com Engineering" group made a career-ending mistake: She cold-contacted an Apple engineer by email, violating the secret and illegal non-solicitation compact that her boss, Eric Schmidt, had agreed with Apple's Steve Jobs.

What happened next is just one of many specific examples of how people's lives were impacted by the Techtopus wage-theft cartel that was taken down by the Department of Justice antitrust division, and is currently being litigated in a landmark class action lawsuit.

This story sent shivers down my spine. What a bunch of horrible, unethical scumbags. Sadly, their criminal behaviour won't really have any meaningful consequences. These people reside above the law.

Thread beginning with comment 585505
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
MOS6510
Member since:
2011-05-12

Yes, I did focus perhaps too much on the recruiter.

It doesn't change much to the core of my argument that we shouldn't be upset or surprised by these things. We should actively fight these mishaps and not just wait until something comes up.

Also, millions may be effected, but I doubt these companies would try to pouch lower staff. It's rare talent and skill that's wanted. So the "millions" is very much theoretical.

Reply Parent Score: 1

kwan_e Member since:
2007-02-18

It's rare talent and skill that's wanted. So the "millions" is very much theoretical.


No it's not. It's very much a part of history. When employers collude, they can use that power to underpay their workers, regardless of how rare their talent is. Every time they're given an inch, the first thing they always try is to reduce salaries/wages.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2014/03/02/karl-marx-warned...

Reply Parent Score: 3

MOS6510 Member since:
2011-05-12

I don't think a number of large IT companies made a secret deal to keep the receptionist wages low. A receptionist is not very likely to get pouched and (s)he'll easily leave for another company if they pay more and nobody will care, they'll just hire a new one.

Never mind other situations, what's going on here is companies like Apple and Google making an (illegal) agreement not to lure each others employees away. Who would you try to lure away? People with skills. People without skills you can get anywhere. I doubt it's about wages for these companies, they just don't want people working on projects to leave to competitors because it not only delays the project, but gives knowledge to the opposition.

Pouching is often done by luring people with a higher wage or other rewards. So these employees that didn't get pouched due to the agreement lost out on higher wages, but this is a side effect of the main goal of the agreement: to stop people switching sides.

Why would you hire a recruiter to pouch a receptionist, janitor or some administrative clerk? You hire a recruiter to get engineers, technicians, managers, scientists, etc... the rare people with rare and valuable talents, skills and knowledge.

If you want a receptionist, janitor or administrative clerk you just post a job ad in the local media. A number will show up and you pick one.

I get a number of "requests" a year, not because I'm a genius, but because I'm an IT person who are wanted right now. People I know who have more regular jobs get none.

Reply Parent Score: 2