Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 14th May 2014 21:10 UTC
Mozilla & Gecko clones

Despite our dislike of DRM, we have come to believe Firefox needs to provide a mechanism for people to watch DRM-controlled content. We will do so in a way that protects the interests of individual users as much as possible, given what the rest of the industry has already put into place. We have selected Adobe to provide the key functionality. Adobe has been doing this in Flash for some time, and Adobe has been building the necessary relationships with the content owners. We believe that Adobe is uniquely able to bring new value to the setting.

Talk about being between a rock and a hard place. Don't include DRM, and see your userbase erode further. Do include DRM, and you go against your organisation's core values. If you go for the former, and your userbase erodes, you run the risk of not being able to express your core values at all.

Thread beginning with comment 589017
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: ...
by silviucc on Thu 15th May 2014 12:51 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: ..."
Member since:

It's still broken man, instead of a hard-fail if OCSP servers don't reply or time-out they will just let you connect to the site...

What are you going to do when they stop maintaining the 34 version? Will you backport security patches on your own?

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[5]: ...
by Morgan on Thu 15th May 2014 14:18 in reply to "RE[4]: ..."
Morgan Member since:

That's a possibility. I might also explore other webkit browsers. But there's no such thing as a fully secure browser, and if you believe there is you're not reading enough. Chromium, as compiled from source, is secure enough for what I do with it. When the day comes that I can't say that, I'll move on, just as I did from Firefox when I didn't like its changes.

I'm not sure where your hostility comes from, but I'm not the one you should be pointing it towards.

Reply Parent Score: 5