To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I remember having heavily debated one or two years ago on OSnews about G4 vs PentiumM...the MAC zealots were so sure that they have the upper hand on mobility and performance. I've been saying all along that Intel PentiumMs give us better performance.
----------------------------------
I'm sorry about the accident
Well thats the only way I can explain it, you've being in a coma for two years and have not being able to keep up with present news
When you was debating, as you said two years ago, it was against the then G4 chip nearing its end on the desk top and the new PM
Now jump two years and we still have the G4 due to not being able to put a G5 in a laptop vs........
Yes an entirely new processor, have you caught the big flaw with your argument yet?






Member since:
2005-09-03
I remember having heavily debated one or two years ago on OSnews about G4 vs PentiumM...the MAC zealots were so sure that they have the upper hand on mobility and performance. I've been saying all along that Intel PentiumMs give us better performance. Looks like in order to get a reasonable performance on you portables Apple has resorted to using Intel chips. Yonah (CoreDuo) is based on PentiumM's architecture, yet it is better than g5 in terms of performance. A word to former PowerPC zealots - future Intel CoreDuo users: welcome to the PC world..you can finally discover what performance means!! (on x86)hehehe