To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Yeah. That's why I said that it, too, is flawed. ;-)
I don't think that a metric exists that really gives a reliable picture of Linux desktop use. And I guess that's what people mean when they say that Ubuntu is the most popular Linux distro.
Certainly, it gets more publicity than any other... for now, anyway.
I have used Ubuntu, and I must say that I was impressed by it. They have made some really good usability decisions. In fact, it is the *only* Debian based distro that I have ever been happy with.
I do have some concerns about the "Ubuntu phenomenon", however.
The first being its lack of any visible^Wviable means of long term support. Outside of having a rich benefactor, Canonical has no business model. I have read interviews of employees who say that while Canonical will be a service company, it has no real business model and is not profitable, and furthermore they don't care.
This does not sound like the best positioning for the future.
A second thing that bothers me about Ubuntu is that while other projects have benevolent dictators, those benevolent dictators hold office due to the respect that they command.
Ubuntu's benevolent dictator ("for life", no less) is more or less guaranteed to keep the position because he's the one with the money. As it stands, Ubuntu would die without his money.
Ubuntu is a good distro. But I'm not sure that I'd want to see it be *the* most popular Linux distro.
"Netcraft is also flawed as a measure of OS popularity. But I'd put more faith in it than I would in distrowatch hits for heaven's sake."
Netcraft measures servers, not desktop installations.
As flawed as distrowatch may, or may not, be Netcraft is a much worse metric for this.
Netcraft measures servers, not desktop installations.
As flawed as distrowatch may, or may not, be Netcraft is a much worse metric for this
The distrowatch page hit counter doesn't measure desktop installations either, it only measures page hits. There are a lot of experienced GNU/Linux users who don't need to consult Distrowatch daily to decide which distro they should choose for their GNU/Linux servers and desktops.
Still, it seems odd that "The Most Popular Linux Distro", which is based on Debian, a strong server OS, and which includes Apache, couldn't garner at least 2% on the Netcraft chart.
Anyway, I find it very unclear what distrowatch is measuring. Page hits from newbies wondering which Linux distro to try? Linux fans checking what all the hype is about? People looking for help in fixing their broken Ubuntu boxes? Who knows? My objection is to the idea that Ubuntu/Mandriva/etc distrowatch hits are somehow proportional to Ubuntu/Mandriva/etc users.
My feeling is that the Distrowatch counter is mainly a hype-o-meter.




Member since:
2005-07-24
> He is criticizing the Ubuntu project because nowadays Ubuntu is by far the most popular linux distribution and getting more and more attention by linux users, including Mandriva users.
Will this myth ever die?! Ubuntu gets the most hits on distrowatch.org. Why people put such credence in that useless statistic, I have never understood. In all fairness, when Mandriva was at the top of that useless metric, it was called the most popular distro, too.
Netcraft is also flawed as a measure of OS popularity. But I'd put more faith in it than I would in distrowatch hits for heaven's sake.
Have a look at:
http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2005/12/05/strong_growth_for_debi...
And no, Ubuntu is not included in the Debian results, as Ubuntu's config of apache clearly identifies itself as Ubuntu. It simply does not run on enough sites to appear in the results.
I'm more or less neutral on Ubuntu vs Mandriva. My distro of choice is RHEL/CentOS. But I do believe in calling a spade a spade.