To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Manmist,
Regarding AppArmor: "SELinux is already upstream. Why is Novell selling security as a proprietary add on?. The user space solution for apprmor is still proprietary for your information."
These links http://developer.novell.com/wiki/index.php/Apparmor_FAQ and http://www.novell.com/products/apparmor/overview.html will explain the product better to you. As for your "proprietary add on" comment I've already stated AppArmor is licensed under the Gnu Public License (GPL) and therefore has no licensing fees. Novell is not forcing anyone to use the security product. What's good is by releasing the product under the GPL they are giving everyone access to another security tool in which to secure their networks.
Regarding XGL license: "Its not. Its under the Xorg license. Atleast get the facts straight"
Well then what you're implying is that information online such as here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XGL where it's stated XGL was released open source 02/02/06 is incorrect.




Member since:
2005-12-18
"
So what you're implying is that we should ignore Novell R & D resources which are structured and well financed and instead look to disorganization as being good for consumers and the Linux community as a whole?"
There is obsolutely no need to do this within closed doors.
"You seem to forget what Novell has done for the Linux community and consumers in general. Such as releasing projects like YAST and AppArmor under the GPL, fighting FUD from SCO and Microsoft, etc"
SELinux is already upstream. Why is Novell selling security as a proprietary add on?. The user space solution for apprmor is still proprietary for your information.
"There's nothing stopping Red Hat, etc from reviewing the code as it's under the GPL."
Its not. Its under the Xorg license. Atleast get the facts straight
:What have companies such as Red Hat and Mandriva done in the last year that is so significant and wasn't just an attempt to make money?:
Who maintains glibc, gcc, large portions of the linux kernel.large amount of GNOME modules etc?