Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 20th Feb 2006 12:22 UTC, submitted by Rahul
Thread beginning with comment 97671
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I don't think he misread you.
If AIGLX is better at any term at all, it should be in the short term, as it only patches in some 3D effects into a 2D environment, without disturbing much the current X code.
XGL(XEGL) is a more ambitious solution which aims to map all of the 2D environment over GL(EGL) and needs a much bigger overhaul of the X code.
Or that is the idea I have got out of that extremely indigestible acronym soup -- X XORG XF86 XGL XEGL GLX GL EGL DRI DRM XAA EXA AIGLX Cairo Mesa XDamage XComposite XRender ...





Member since:
2005-12-13
What are you talking about XGL is a better short term solution. You think that 3d rending is going some where? Anything involving any kind of 2D rendering _anywhere_ on the desktop is a short term solution. If that isn't obvious to you I think you need to look at OSX and Vista who are the competition.