Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 27th Feb 2006 17:08 UTC, submitted by Nehru
Thread beginning with comment 99855
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: I wonder what this is all about
by modmans2ndcoming on Tue 28th Feb 2006 02:51
in reply to "RE: I wonder what this is all about"
RE[3]: I wonder what this is all about
by BluenoseJake on Tue 28th Feb 2006 18:00
in reply to "RE[2]: I wonder what this is all about"
RE[2]: I wonder what this is all about
by Ford Prefect on Tue 28th Feb 2006 12:17
in reply to "RE: I wonder what this is all about"
This is not true. In times of the 386, 486 processors Intel had the problem of Noname-competitors like AMD who brought in some "compatible" processors which weren't as performant as the original ones.
This lead Intel to start a branding like "Pentium", as it wasn't only a number so others couldn't call their processors the same.
Others started to bring out "586" processors or AMD the K5. It wasn't as good as the Pentium, floating point lacked a lot in performance compared to the Pentium!
Even the K6 was still behind Intel. One have to say that it also was much cheaper. 





Member since:
2006-01-12
Intel has always been playing catch up...
they havent been better than AMD in, well I cant remember when their chips were better
they cost more, they are slower (price perfomance ratio) and now they run hotter)
they were never a leader (except in sales)