Palm Quietly Responds to Apple’s Quiet Threat

Several days ago when Apple hinted at legal action against Palm, we held our breath to see just what would happen. Now Palm has stepped up to the plate boldly and hinted that they’d fight whatever legal action is thrown at them.

In the infamous words of Lynn Fox, a Palm spokesperson, in response to Apple’s barred teeth:

Palm has a long history of innovation that is reflected in our products and robust patent portfolio, and we have long been recognized for our fundamental patents in the mobile space. If faced with legal action, we are confident that we have the tools necessary to defend ourselves.

In a previous article on OSNews concerning Apple’s veiled threats, Thom mentioned that “Palm better not infringe on any iPhone patents when Palm launches the Pre, because Apple is ready and willing to take such a case to courts.” It’s sounding as if Palm isn’t backing down in fear as Apple hoped, but quite the contrary. Could a vicious legal battle ensue when the Pre is released? It’s looking like a possibility.

58 Comments

  1. siraf72 2009-01-25 1:20 pm EST
  2. kajaman 2009-01-25 1:22 pm EST
    • jabbotts 2009-01-25 1:46 pm EST
      • Adurbe 2009-01-25 4:10 pm EST
        • _txf_ 2009-01-25 4:24 pm EST
          • melgross 2009-01-25 8:19 pm EST
          • Thom Holwerda 2009-01-25 8:24 pm EST
          • melgross 2009-01-25 8:31 pm EST
          • Thom Holwerda 2009-01-25 9:13 pm EST
          • cycoj 2009-01-26 7:04 pm EST
          • Adurbe 2009-01-25 11:02 pm EST
          • _txf_ 2009-01-25 11:13 pm EST
          • Adurbe 2009-01-26 12:03 am EST
          • _txf_ 2009-01-26 12:20 am EST
          • Adurbe 2009-01-26 9:47 am EST
          • _txf_ 2009-01-26 11:21 am EST
          • jabbotts 2009-01-26 1:52 pm EST
        • TheBadger 2009-01-25 6:55 pm EST
          • melgross 2009-01-25 8:23 pm EST
          • _txf_ 2009-01-25 10:45 pm EST
          • gustl 2009-01-27 2:04 pm EST
        • spiderman 2009-01-25 9:31 pm EST
        • jabbotts 2009-01-26 1:26 pm EST
    • google_ninja 2009-01-25 2:57 pm EST
      • slight 2009-01-25 5:52 pm EST
    • melgross 2009-01-25 8:00 pm EST
      • christianhgross 2009-01-25 9:34 pm EST
      • elsewhere 2009-01-26 5:36 am EST
      • jabbotts 2009-01-26 1:28 pm EST
  3. bibe 2009-01-25 1:55 pm EST
    • tyrione 2009-01-25 11:34 pm EST
      • bibe 2009-01-26 10:19 am EST
      • BallmerKnowsBest 2009-01-26 1:57 pm EST
    • aliquis 2009-01-26 2:24 am EST
  4. matatk 2009-01-25 2:00 pm EST
    • melgross 2009-01-25 8:10 pm EST
      • SReilly 2009-01-26 12:05 pm EST
  5. Fransexy 2009-01-25 3:26 pm EST
    • mrhasbean 2009-01-25 10:01 pm EST
    • BallmerKnowsBest 2009-01-25 10:03 pm EST
      • mrhasbean 2009-01-25 10:41 pm EST
        • _txf_ 2009-01-25 10:51 pm EST
  6. acobar 2009-01-25 3:28 pm EST
    • melgross 2009-01-25 8:19 pm EST
      • wakeupneo 2009-01-26 3:47 pm EST
        • _txf_ 2009-01-26 3:51 pm EST
          • wakeupneo 2009-01-26 4:04 pm EST
          • _txf_ 2009-01-26 5:46 pm EST
  7. mpxlbs 2009-01-25 5:12 pm EST
    • mrhasbean 2009-01-25 10:07 pm EST
      • Thom Holwerda 2009-01-25 10:40 pm EST
        • mrhasbean 2009-01-25 11:01 pm EST
  8. BallmerKnowsBest 2009-01-25 5:33 pm EST
  9. mckill 2009-01-25 6:47 pm EST
  10. bousozoku 2009-01-25 9:03 pm EST
  11. akrosdbay 2009-01-26 8:33 am EST
    • Soulbender 2009-01-26 8:35 am EST
  12. brown_rm 2009-01-26 4:48 pm EST